Biometric analysis of interspecific hybrids between Rosa canina L. and Rosa rubiginosa L. (section Caninae DC. em. Christ.)

  • Anna Sołtys-Lelek Ojców National Park, 32-047 Ojców 9, Poland
  • Beata Barabasz-Krasny Institute of Biology, Pedagogical University, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Poland
  • Peter Turis Low Tatras National Park, Lazovná 10, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
  • Ingrid Turisová Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
  • Wojciech Gruszka Department of Biology, Morphological and Health Sciences., Faculty of Physical Culture in Gorzów Wlkp., University School of Physical Education in Poznań, Estkowskiego 13, 66-400 Gorzów Wlkp., Poland

Abstract

The article presents the biometric analysis of selected morphological features of interspecies hybrid Rosa canina L. × R. rubiginosa L. This hybrid was the result of spontaneous hybridization between the two species falling into section Caninae DC. em. Christ. So far, it has not been studied in terms of morphological characteristics, in particular with respect to the parental forms.

References

Blackhurst H.T. 1947. Cytogenetic studies on Rosa rubiginosa L. and its hybrids. Doctoral dissertation, A. & M. College of Texas. Texas A. & M. University. Available electronically from http://hdl.handle.net /1969.1/ETD-TAMU-TXA0181161.
De Cock K. 2008. Genetic diversity of wild roses (Rosa spp.) in Europe, with an in-depth morphological study of Flemish populations. PhD, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels.
De Cock K., Mijnsbrugge K.V., Breyne P., Nybom H., Smulders M.J.M., Van Slycken J., De Riek J. 2007. The diversity of autochthonous roses in Flanders (Belgium) in the view of the European Generose Reference Framework. Acta Hortic. 760: 621–628.
De Cock K., Mijnsbrugge K.V., Breyne P., Van Bockstaele E., Van Slycken J. 2008. Morphological and AFLP-based differentiation within the taxonomical complex section Caninae (subgenus Rosa). Ann. Bot. 102 (5): 685–97.
Gustafsson Ä. 1944. The constitution of the Rosa canina complex. Hereditas 30: 405–428.
Kerényi-Nagy V. 2012. A Történelmi Magyarország területén élő őshonos, idegenhonos és kultúr-reliktum rózsák kismonográfiája. A small monograph of autochton, allochton and cultur-relict roses of the Historical Hungary, NYME Egyetemi Kiadó, Sopron.
Mijnsbrugge K.V., Beeckman H. 2012. Geographically differentiating morphology of genetically similar dogroses: consequences of canina meiosis. Plant Syst. Evol. 298 (9): 1733–1742.
Popek R. 1996. Biosystematyczne studia nad rodzajem Rosa L. w Polsce i krajach ościennych. Prace Monograficzne 218. Wyd. Nauk. WSP, Kraków. (In Polish)
Popek R. 2007. Dziko rosnące róże Europy. Officina Botanica, Kraków. (In Polish)
Ritz C. M., Wissemann V. 2011. Microsatellite analyses of artificial and spontaneous dogrose hybrids reveal the hybridogenic origin of Rosa micrantha by the contribution of unreduced gametes. J. Hered. 102 (2): 217–227.
Wissemann V. 2006. Beauty and the bastards. Intensive hybridization controls the evolution of wild roses. B.I.F. FUTURA 21: 158–163.
Zieliński J. 1985. Studia nad rodzajem Rosa L. – systematyka sekcji Caninae DC. em Christ. Arboretum Kórnickie 30: 3–109. (In Polish)
Zieliński J. 1987. Rodzaj Rosa L. In: Jasiewicz A. (red.), Flora Polski. T. 5. PWN. Warszawa. (In Polish)
Fig. 1. Morphological characteristics of leaf (A) and fruit (B, C), that were measured or observed; C – upper part of hip.
Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
SOŁTYS-LELEK, Anna et al. Biometric analysis of interspecific hybrids between Rosa canina L. and Rosa rubiginosa L. (section Caninae DC. em. Christ.). Modern Phytomorphology, [S.l.], v. 9, p. 19-25, june 2016. ISSN 2227-9555. Available at: <http://ojs.phytomorphology.org/index.php/MP/article/view/27>. Date accessed: 11 apr. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.159692.
Section
Research Articles